Tag: jetbrains resharper c++ crack
Why do you need step filters? Well, the illustration below explains pretty much everything: Some functions never need to be stepped into because they are either very simple or very well tested. But the problem is that the debugger cannot tell which functions are worth debugging and which are not, and therefore Step Into will not miss any function on its way.
C++ Tools – JetBrains ReSharper C++ is slowly winning me over
Initially I found it got in my way but slowly I think it’s training me to ignore the niggles and I’m finding the functionality quite compelling. At present, I’m most interested in the “code inspection” report from Resharper.
Comparing it to the similar functionality in PC-Lint and Initially I’d spoken to support and been told how to turn off the inspection in the addin to help reduce the lag that I was seeing in the editor. This worked, to a point, didn’t really reduce the lag that much but removed the inspection functionality from the addin which affects how useful the inspection report is. The problem with the inspection report is that it’s just a report that lets you navigate to the code in question.
The idea is that you then use the addin’s squiggles and icons to help you fix the issues. I was hoping for there to be a ‘just fix it’ option from the report, but there isn’t. With the addin’s inspection enabled again the inspection report is more useful.
You produce a list of issues, brute force exclude issues of types that you’re not interested in right now and then work through the issues. As you click on each issue you get dumped in the editor at the point where it occurs and can use the addin to fix the problem or refactor. For some issues I’d like to see the option of a global change being possible. A “fix ALL of these violations” option. Most issues need a bit of “per issue thought” though and so the existing approach works fine.
I’m liking the fact that there’s the option to refactor the problems away, it means that some issues that I would previously have added PC-Lint suppressions for are being fixed because it’s so easy to rename variables.
With Resharper you’re pointed towards an easy way to fix the issue and it’s easier to fix than it is to suppress. As far as suppression goes I think I need to investigate more. I want to be able to have ‘global’ suppressions and ‘local’ ones. Ideally I’d like ‘per project’ supressions so that, for example, this lib has it’s own suppression file that is found and used automatically whenever it’s used as source in another project Finally I think the ability to say to the tool ‘ignore all my suppressions and let me have the results raw’ is also important.
I need look into this side of things. As I mentioned before, the support is excellent. Very prompt responses that show that the person actually understands what you want to do and, generally, providing helpful advice either for solving the issue or for “using the tool the correct way”. I’m now thinking that I probably will end up buying a license
Unreachable code? Redundant statements? Suspicious object slicing? Incorrect format specifier? Find usages and navigate code You can instantly jump to any file, type, or type member in a solution. You can search for usages of code and get a clear view of the found usages, with the grouping and preview options.
VIDEO: ReSharper by Language: C++ – Help | ReSharper
The latest Tweets from ReSharper C++ (@resharper_cpp). Visual Studio extension for C++ developers. Inspired by @ReSharper. Made by @JetBrains. ReSharper C++ makes Visual Studio a better IDE with code analysis. With ReSharper, you can maintain step filters — a list of function masks that tells the support soft.isp.regruhosting.rupfilter files gets disabled if ReSharper C++ is installed.